Recent sightings of Terence Crawford alongside former WBO light heavyweight champion Dmitry Bivol at the IBF Champions Night have stirred discussions regarding Crawford’s strategic calculations for his boxing career. Many speculate that this moment was more than mere coincidence, suggesting it might be an early step in preparing for a high-stakes bout against Canelo Alvarez slated for next May. However, this approach raises questions about the feasibility and logic behind seeking advice from a fighter like Bivol, especially considering the stark contrasts in their fighting styles and physical attributes.
Crawford’s current pursuits might seem ambitious, yet they appear misguided when analyzing the differences between him and Bivol. With an esteemed record of 41 wins with 31 by knockout, Crawford’s prowess in the ring is undeniable. Nevertheless, he faces significant challenges in terms of size and fighting style when considering a match against Canelo, who holds a considerable weight and reach advantage. Bivol, known for his strategic prowess and power at light heavyweight, fought successfully against Canelo previously, utilizing a style that Crawford does not mirror. Consequently, seeking insights from Bivol could be ineffective and unproductive.
The boxing community has also speculated on Crawford’s potential avoidance of an immediate and taxing bout with the rising star Vergil Ortiz Jr. Due to a minor injury, Crawford has determined to postpone action until May, coinciding with Canelo’s scheduled fight. This alignment of timelines hints at a calculated maneuver to evade a potent challenger like Ortiz, a fighter known for his explosive style and youth. Instead of risking a loss against Ortiz, Crawford aims to position himself strategically for a bout against Canelo, possibly leveraging negotiations through influential figures like Turki Alalshikh.
Rumors surrounding Canelo’s financial demands for a potential clash with Crawford add another layer of complexity to the situation. Allegations of Canelo seeking a whopping $180 million serve as a sign of his disinterest, as well as a reflection of the financial intricacies that dominate high-profile boxing matches today. If Canelo’s extravagance influences his willingness to engage, Crawford must weigh the implications of such a request against potential earnings and reputational stakes.
Revisiting Bivol’s last encounter against Artur Beterbiev, where he faced defeat by majority decision, further complicates Crawford’s position. Bivol’s performance in that fight may diminish his credibility as a mentor for Crawford. After experiencing a loss where he appeared to lack initiative, the effectiveness of Bivol’s advice can be questioned. If Crawford is aiming for a comprehensive understanding of winning strategies, he may need to look beyond Bivol, who himself may not have the recent success to back up his insights.
While Terence Crawford’s maneuvers to secure a fight against Canelo Alvarez are understandable, they require more than just strategic meetings with former champions. The complexities of size, style, and recent performances necessitate a reevaluation of his plans if he hopes to secure a victory in the ring against a formidable opponent like Canelo. As such, Crawford stands at a crossroads where both direction and strategy will define his future in boxing.
Leave a Reply